Monthly Archives: Dec 2009

Is SaaS Renting?

Posted on by

Emrecan Dogan has a good analysis of content rental business models.  He's created a simple framework for evaluating the dynamics of renting different types of content, and he's taken as examples books, textboks, music, movies, video games and software.

Of this list, the software example has attracted my attention.  I think Emrecan's talking about shrink-wrapped software.  He's attached it an average price point of $90. And he concludes that the rental market potential is low.

This made me think of Software-as-a-Service models, which are frequently thought of as rental models.  But when you approach it using Emrecan's framework, SaaS looks more like a subscription/service model than a true rental model.

Maybe it's just a semantics issue but I have seen so many cases where SaaS is treated like a rental approach that I thought the difference is worth noting.

Entrepreneurial Focus

Posted on by

Mark Suster has been blogging about entrepreneurial characteristics.  I like his list and agree with all of his points.

The topic has made me think about a key difference I have noticed in Turkish entrepreneurs and their counterparts in the US (and largely, western Europe): multiple, parallel ventures.

I understand this in the entrepreneurs who are emerging out of a "work for hire" service shop.  In those cases, many of the parallel ventures are off-shoots of ideas or products developed previously.

I also understand large groups of entrepreneurs. In that case there may be excess capacity at the leadership level that gets taken up by a new good idea that the team just does not want to let go.

However, it's surprising to me that a small team that's gone to work on a great idea can find time to focus on a second (or sometimes, third or fourth) project.  There's usually so much work involved in getting one idea off the ground that it should be extremely difficult to parallel process multiple projects.

One reason for the popularity of this model in Turkey may be the scarcity of capital.  Entrepreneurs don't want to put all of their eggs in one basket.  And if they don't have an outside investor who's directing them to focus on one idea, they try to progress several ventures together to see which one is getting traction.

In our investments, we try to get the entrepreneurs to focus on the idea at hand. Many times, there are previous projects they continue to be involved in, but the core focus always has to be in the company we've invested in.

My VC Presentation at Etohum

Posted on by

UPDATE: The folks at Etohum have just uploaded a video of my presentation on Venture Capital, on December 19th at the Etohum Entrepreneurship Camp.  The video is in Turkish.

http://televidyon.com/video-paylas/2122

Here's the presentation accompanying my talk on venture capital at Etohum last week.  Sorry for the tardy post.

NB. It's in Turkish.

Etohum Kampı – Girişim Sermayesihttp://static.slidesharecdn.com/swf/ssplayer2.swf?doc=giriimsermayesietohum19dec2009-091221151030-phpapp02&stripped_title=etohum-kamp-giriim-sermayesi

View more presentations from Burak Buyukdemir.

Etohum Presentation on VC

Posted on by

On Saturday, I presented an introduction to venture capital at Etohum's Entrpreneurship Camp.  It was fun for me and I hope the attendees found it useful.  I was a bit concerned that I did not answer all the questions to the satisfaction of the crowd, due to time limitations.  I was also a bit disappointed in my ability to answer the questions using proper Turkish – something I strived for – and I think largely accomplished – in the main presentation.  It's difficult for me to deal with industry jargon in Turkish, because it feels a bit artificial and also because I don't necessarily use it in my day to day dealings.  It's easier to fall back on English.

The presentation was streamed live, and I understand Etohum will make it available as a video online soon.

Following the presentation, I came across an article in Entrepreneur magazine titled "4 Common VC Myths".  Even though I might not agree with all the points, especially the attempt at generalizing in the first point, I think it's a good intro for those who may have had their questions go unanswered on Staurday.

Twitter Spawning 50K Apps

Posted on by

By now it's obvious that much of Twitter's value comes from its platform characteristics.  I can not think of another company that better embodies the spirit of connectedness in 2009.  But, hearing that 50,000 registered applications to date have been built using Twitter APIs, is still mindboggling.

It's also the evidence of Twitter's openness that powers its growth.

Twitter & Google Starting to Date?

Posted on by

Googtw After yesterday's announcement of Yahoo intergating wih Facebook Connect, comes the news of Google and Twitter joining forces to allow Twitter integration with Google's Friend Connect.

John Battalle reads this as "Twitter, as in Not Facebook". On the opposite side, Marshall Kirkpatrick's take on it is "just like Yahoo bowed to Facebook, Google is bowing to Twitter".

I think I have a different view of this.  Despite the timing of both transactions, they represent different strategies to me.  Yahoo's move was a bow to Facebook, in favor of its users and the utility they extract from Yahoo, but eroding a strategic advantage Yahoo may have pursued through its massive reach.

Google's move, on the other hand, is less about bowing to Twitter.  Twitter knows surprisingly little about its users, whereas Google knows a ton – thorough clickstreams, search behavior and Gmail.  In fact, I'd say Google still owns a much larger chunk of the social graph than Twitter.  What Twitter is great at is realtime and declared interests.  And it's growing super fast.

This move by Google and Twitter makes me suspect even more my prediction yesterday.  This alliance will allow Google to observe how Twitter helps its users and evaluate Twitter as a potential acquisiton target.  It will also help Google to preserve some ground against Facebook, who has now clearly become the only contender to Google for ownership of the identity layer of the internet.

Facebook Eliminates One Rival in the Race for Social Graph Ownership

Posted on by

Rocky_victory Today's announcement that Yahoo is integrating into Facebook Connect must have been accompanied with the sound of champagne bottles popping over at Facebook's headquarters.  It's a big victory for Facebook as it advances towards ownership of the identity layer of the internet.

To be honest, I am a bit puzzled at the early concession by Yahoo.  I am fuly convinced that by now Yahoo sees itself as a media company.  It's obvious with its concentration on content.  But, it also has an enormous amount of data on users and, through Yahoo Mail and Yahoo Groups, a nice chunk of the social graph.  And I would have expected Yahoo to try to extract some value out of that.

What's weird is that Mashable is calling this:

"…a no-brainer for Yahoo, who has been trying for years to make its services more social on its own. Now, they’ll start to see some of the benefits that smaller publishers have seen from Facebook Connect (more comments, extra traffic from Facebook, etc.) on a massive scale."

That is ridiculous.  Yahoo is not a small publisher.  It's one of the first and greatest destinations on the internet.  It's got as much traffic as Facebook and more members (500m vs Facebook's 350m).  Why is Yahoo doing this?  And isn't it ironic that the announcement is coming from Jim Stoneham, who's responsible for Yahoo communities?

Om agrees with me and sees Facebook as the big winner and Yahoo as the big loser here, and compares this move to Yahoo's deal with Google in terms of magnitude.  I think this is actually a bigger deal. In search, Yahoo lost to Google's technology.  It did not have much chance against Google.  Whereas in this case, Yahoo's still got a ton of data (groups data, mail-related social graph, hotjobs-driven professional information, flickr's social graph, etc.) to be a contender in the identity layer game.

I expect the next move from Google.  Facebook's got a lot of momentum and Google can not watch this passively. I'd predicted Twitter being bought in 2009.  It was not.  2010 maybe?

Sanalika

Posted on by

Yesterday I blogged about my surprise upon seeing the Turkish virtual world Sanalika on Google's fastest rising list for 2009.  I further commented that "it has not made much of an impact in the Turkish internet scene so far".

I have since been contacted by a few friends in the Turkish gaming community who informed me that in facti Sanalika is a strong contender and that Alexa does not fairly represent Sanalika's traffic because of its flash-based site.  I stand corrected.

Turks on Google 2009: Sahadan and Sanalika?

Posted on by

Right after my earlier post today on top search terms of 2009, I saw that Google had just released their Zeitgeist 2009.  While it's difficult to do an apples-to-apples comparison with Yahoo and Bing, the Fastest Rising List gives a taste:

  1. michael jackson
  2. facebook
  3. tuenti
  4. twitter
  5. sanalika
  6. new moon
  7. lady gaga
  8. windows 7
  9. dantri.com.vn
  10. torpedo gratis

And, yes, MJ tops this list, too! 🙂

However, what piqued my interest the most in Google's Zeitgeist this year are the Turkish entries, namely:

Sanalika, #5 in Fastest Rising

and

Sahadan, #4 in Fastest Rising in Sports.

Mind you, these are Global lists…

Sahadan is a Turkish sports news website, and to me, it's the less surprising of the two.  It's a solid property, a long-time resident of the Turkish Alexa 100, and given the level of interest in football in Turkey, a top Turkish site is not a far-fetched entry in the Google list.  Also notable is the fact that it's ranked above Livescore.

Sanalika, however,is a different story.  Ranking 375th in Alexa's Turkey rankings, it's a virtual world similar to IMVU or Popmundo. It has not made much of an impact in the Turkish internet scene so far, so I had to doublecheck when I saw its name on the Google list.

I still suspect Sanalika's inclusion on the list may be a quirk of the methodology used.  Curious…

Also, note KralOyun, a Turkish game portal, #6 in the Fastest Falling list.

All in all, Turks are showing their strong online presence as we've noted before.

UPDATE: The Sanalika saga continues with comments from Arda on TC Europe and Robin on TC.

Yahoo vs Bing Search Terms

Posted on by

In the last couple of days, both Bing and Yahoo announced their top search terms for 2010.  Here they are:

For Yahoo:

  1. Michael Jackson
  2. Twilight
  3. WWE
  4. Megan Fox
  5. Britney Spears
  6. Naruto
  7. American Idol
  8. Kim Kardashian
  9. NASCAR
  10. Runescape

And, Bing:

  1. Michael Jackson
  2. Twitter
  3. Swine Flu
  4. Stock Market
  5. Farrah Fawcett
  6. Patrick Swayze
  7. Cash for Clunkers
  8. Jon and Kate Gosselin
  9. Billy Mays
  10. Jaycee Dugard

While it's not really surprising that MJ topped both lists, I am blown away by how dissimilar the two lists are.  Jackson is the ONLY common searched topic on the two search engines.  Venture Beat has an explanation:

Perhaps that’s not surprising — Bing is a much newer service, and
probably appealed to a more tech-aware audience. Yahoo, on the other
hand, reaches more users
(though it plans to replace its underlying search technology with
Bing), and its list skews even more heavily towards celebrities and pop
culture.

But I don't buy it.  Bing and Yahoo are both very mainstream search engines.  I could expect a difference of this magnitude on Powerset, Hakia or Wolfram Alpha, but the difference leads me to suspect that maybe there is a difference in methodologies.

I am looking forward to Google's Yearend Zeitgeist to see how that compares.